You forgot to provide an Email Address.

This email address doesn’t appear to be valid.

This email address is already registered. Please log in.

You have exceeded the maximum character limit.

Please provide a Corporate Email Address.

Please check the box if you want to proceed.

Please check the box if you want to proceed.

By submitting my Email address I confirm that I have read and accepted the Terms of Use and Declaration of Consent.

Wireless standards documents can be hundreds of pages long and fraught with technical minutiae. But the important highlights generally boil down to a short list of talking points that differentiate one standard from its predecessor.

With the buzz about the latest Wi-Fi standard -- 802.11ax, also known as Wi-Fi 6 -- it's worth examining the new standard versus its predecessor, 802.11ac, also known as Wi-Fi 5. As we compare 802.11ac vs. 802.11ax, some important differences emerge between the two specifications.

Where 802.11ac was considered evolutionary, 802.11ax has sometimes been labeled revolutionary. Even if that sounds grandiose, the new .11ax magic is different enough in several technical constructs to warrant scrutiny and to appreciate the real changes under the hood versus past standards.

Some of the key differences between 802.11ac and 802.11ax include the following:

Let's start with the spectrum in play for 802.11ac vs. 802.11ax. Many people don't realize, when they buy a dual-band .11ac access point (AP), that the 2.4 GHz band reflects a much older standard -- namely 802.11n. Why? 802.11ac operates only in the 5 GHz band, while 802.11ax works in both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

This article is part of

Additionally, while the .11ac standard allowed up to eight spatial streams, the hardware market stagnated at four. For 802.11ax, eight spatial stream APs are theoretically possible.

The significance here is that 802.11ac never got close to delivering its maximum potential of 6.9 Gbps because of hardware limitations. By contrast, .11ax is better positioned to deliver its own maximum of 9.6 Gbps, albeit under ideal conditions that most of us still may never achieve.

One factor that prevailed in the earliest versions of the 802.11 standard also holds true in 802.11ax. In a well-designed Wi-Fi network, you can generally expect to see better data rates at the same ranges and power levels as the technology you are replacing. Simply put, you can expect better cell quality.

Now to the nitty-gritty of what makes performance gains possible when considering 802.11ax vs. 802.11ac: You'll see the 4x multiplier used fairly frequently when comparing the specifics of the two standards.

For example, .11ax, at its best, uses 1024 quadrature amplitude modulation, as opposed to .11ac's 256 QAM scheme. This means the symbol duration for .11ax is four times wider than .11ac, which lets more data pass through in a given operational time slot. Then, there is nearly a 4x reduction in spacing between the modulated sub-carriers in .11ax, meaning that more spectrum is actually used for data transfer and less for management.

When comparing 802.11ac vs. 802.11ax, other significant developments include the following:

As good as 802.11ac is, it has no effective way to deal with interference from neighboring cells on the same channel, which can translate into reduced performance. BSS coloring in 802.11ax adds a field to the wireless frame that overcomes issues associated with same-frequency cell coexistence, leading to increased overall capacity.

As you can see, 802.11ax has some powerful features, which is impressive when you consider that 802.11ac, as a standard, is no slouch.

How will BSS coloring boost Wi-Fi 6 performance?

Vonage drops an embedded video conferencing tool that can live on any platform and a mass communication tool to let enterprises ...

This guide gathers the latest news and analysis from Enterprise Connect, one of the largest enterprise communications and ...

Microsoft 365 Copilot integrates AI-supported tools into Microsoft's productivity apps to help users write and organize emails, ...

Organizations can use the iPadOS Files app to manage files locally or in the cloud. Learn the pros and cons of both storage types...

It's important to ensure that files are secure and easy to work with on enterprise mobile devices. In iOS, the Files app is a key...

If the native macOS file manager is lacking, IT can look to third-party options for advanced features. Commander One, ForkLift ...

Nvidia and Quantum Machines deliver a new architecture that combines CPUs and GPUs with quantum technologies.

At the recent IBM Infrastructure Analyst Event, IBM announced advances in IBM zSystems for AI, app architecture and other areas ...

Many organizations want to simplify or scale down their data centers -- but they won't disappear. Admins can examine as-a-service...

VMware's partner program gets a new look as the company invests in the subscription model; Endor Labs, Graphiant and TrueFort ...

IT shops appear ready to focus on cloud costs amid inflation and economic uncertainty. Service providers expect clients to invest...

Digital transformation can take too long and fail to deliver. Root causes include lack of focus, cultural barriers and technical ...

All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2023, TechTarget Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information